Appellate Court Rulings in Sexual Harassment Cases
| Case | Kohler v. Inter-Tel Technologies |
| Cite | 244 F. 3d 1167 |
| Summary of Ruling | California Courts might use a Federal ruling which allows employers to defend themselves against sexual harassement cases when there was a company procedure to report the harassment and the employee did not ues it. |
| Case | Kohler v. Inter-Tel Technologies |
| Cite | 2001 D.J. D.A.R. 3560 |
| Summary of Ruling | Federal laws gives employers certain defenses against sexual harassment cases. These include the fact that the victim failed to report the sexual harassment, even though there was a procedure by which she could report it to her superiors. This defense has never been applied under California state law. In this decision, a federal court determined that the state courts probably would allow defendants to use this defense. |
| Case | Tennison v. Circus-Circus |
| Cite | 244 F.3d 684 |
| Summary of Ruling | Sexual harassment against employees other than the claimant may not be admitted if the probative value is outweighed by undue prejudice. |